Tushar Vakil

Categories
Leadership

Everything you ever wanted to know about executive coaching

What is executive coaching? Difference between executive coaching & leadership coaching? Why do companies hire executive coaches? Who is the best executive coach? Read the article to find out.

What is executive coaching?

Leaders have a high level of responsibility for the current success and future sustainability of any organization.  Organizations invest in the development of such leaders.  Traditionally, executive education, training programs, mentoring, challenging assignments, job shadowing, etc., are the tools used for leadership development in organizations.

Executive coaching is a recent entrant in the list of tools for leadership development in organizations.   Executive coaching focuses on the leader’s personal development for him/her to be a more effective leader.

Executive coaching is a one on one relationship between a client (a leader) and a professionally qualified coach, that focuses on increasing the self-awareness of the client’s own thoughts, behaviors, and actions, and its impact on his/her effectiveness as a leader, and to change them for the leader to become a more effective leader.

The Center for Creative Leadership’s Handbook on Coaching defines the intent of coaching as to “help leaders understand themselves more fully so that they can draw on their strengths and use them more effectively and intentionally, improve identified development needs, and develop untested potential.”

Executive Coaching involves helping leaders gain clarity about their own motivations, aspirations, and commitment to change, so that they can lead more effectively.”

The ultimate outcome of executive coaching is to help the leader make a sustainable behavior change, leading to improved performance and better relationships at work.

The origin of the word coach

Kocs was a small town in Hungary. In the early 15th century, the town was known for making a light wooden enclosure on wheels pulled by horses and used for transportation. 

Now, this light wooden enclosure was state-of-the art and much lighter and faster than anything available then.  Hence it became popular and later spread all across Europe over the next century and was called kocsi. The Hungarian word “kocsi”, means “of Kocs” or from Kocs or made in Kocs.

The Spanish and Portuguese coach, the German Kutsche, and the Slovak koč and Czech kočár and the English word coach – all probably derive from the Hungarian word kocsi. 

These coaches arrived in England around 1580.  Later, in the 19th century, the term coach was used for U.S. railway carriages. In the 20th century, the term was used to describe horse-driven carriages and later motor coaches that eventually evolved into automobiles.

In its literal sense, the word coach is a vehicle that takes a person from where they are to somewhere they want to go.  In the present day, the word coach keeps the same analogy. A coach helps an individual take him from where he currently is to where he wants to go. 

Not in the sense of going from one place to another, but in the sense of going from their current situation (career, physical, financial, emotional, etc.) to where they want to go – the desired goal – to be in a better shape, improve their performance, improve their finances, relate better with people, etc.

A brief history of modern coaching

The sports coach

When the word coach is used for a layperson, they usually think of a professional sports coach. Coaching, for the most of the 20th century, was associated with sports. Whether it is an individual sport like tennis or a team sport like football, it is customary to have a coach in any professional sport. 

The player herself may be talented, but to compete and win at higher levels, she will utilize a professional coach’s services.  There is no stigma attached to having a coach; rather, working with a renowned coach is highly desired by any athlete.

But it wasn’t always like that.  In the earlier part of the 20th century, they considered the concept of hiring a professional coach to improve the performance of an athlete to be dishonorable and disgraceful. An athlete should have “natural” talent and should not need any external help. 

Today, no individual athlete or a team would even think of participating in any sport at a competitive level without a coach’s help.  A good coach helps the individual athlete or a team perform at their best.

Executive coaching in organizations

A similar evolution happened with professional coaching in the business environment also.  Coaching in the current form started in the late 80s and early 90s. Before that, mentoring and hiring external consultants was prevalent but wasn’t termed as coaching and had a different purpose. 

There was also a stigma attached to admitting that an individual needed the help of a “consultant” to help the leader overcome some form of “weakness.”  

In the early years of executive coaching, hiring a coach for the executive in an organization was considered to be something that the executive was usually not proud to share with others.  The perception was that if they assigned an executive a coach – he needed to be “fixed” or “remedied.”

Over the last decade or so, executive coaching has gained immense popularity.  A majority of Fortune 500 companies use executive coaching as part of their leadership development initiatives. 

As executive coaching has gained popularity, the availability of executive coaches has also increased significantly.  Today, senior leaders consider executive coaching a badge of honor.  It conveys to the leader and the others that the company considers them worthwhile to invest in their development via coaching.

Why is executive coaching so popular?

From the second world war until the Berlin wall’s falling in 1989 – businesses were predominantly industrial and manufacturing in nature.  The business operation was predictable, and the pace of change was quite “reasonable” to manage.  Over the last three decades, there have been many political, economic, social, and technological changes.  They have impacted the way business is done.

Here are some of the significant factors contributing to these changes in the business environment. 

Globalization

Advances in technology, communication, internet, and supply chain efficiency meant that a large company could produce the goods anywhere globally, where it is the most cost-effective, and sell them anywhere in the world, where it is the most profitable.  It also meant that your competitor maybe anyone around the world who can produce and deliver the goods or services cheaper, faster, or better than your company.  Businesses became global, and so did the competition.

Leaner and flatter organizational structure

Organizations are leaner and flatter.  Less number of employees means more demand for existing employees.  Flatter and less hierarchical organizations mean more independent teams that are more responsive to the changes.

The fast pace of change is getting faster.

Before the 1980s, the businesses had long periods of stability followed by intermittent change and then another stable period.  Today, with the aid of technology, change, innovation, and disruption have become a norm.  Transition is a continuous process.  The pace of change is fast and getting faster.

Knowledgeable and demanding customers

With the availability of any information over the internet, consumers have become knowledgeable, savvy, and demanding. This puts an additional burden on businesses to deliver value to customers.

Multi-generational multi-cultural and multinational workforce

After the fall of the Berlin wall, businesses have had the opportunity to expand globally in areas that were not accessible due to regulations.  They have also had to hire a workforce that was multinational, multi-cultural, and multi-generational.  Engaging and managing such a diverse workforce needed a new set of skills on the parts of leaders.

High demand, competition, and turnover of talented employees

As businesses have expanded over the globe, there is an increased demand for talented employees.  In the 50’s and ’60s, there was lifetime employment for any employee and probably with the same company.  Today, no one expects lifetime employment, neither the company nor the employee.  Employees are mobile geographically, across industries, and across companies.  As a result, talented employees are in high demand.  Businesses have to work hard to attract and retain talented employees.

Increased pressure on executives to deliver results

All of these factors have a significant impact on businesses.  They have also placed an enormous amount of stress on the leaders expected to navigate this complex environment and deliver value to stakeholders in terms of revenue, profits, and customer satisfaction.

A new business environment needed a new approach.

The world, and consequently businesses, have become more complex, global, and subject to continuous change.   Although the term VUCA  (volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous) was originally used by the United States military to describe the extreme conditions in Iraq and Afghanistan, VUCA accurately describes the present day’s business environment.  VUCA world has also forced the change in leadership style from autocratic and to more of a catalyst, facilitator, and coach.  In fact, the coaching style of leadership is both highly desired and highly effective to lead in a VUCA world.

The advent and the rise in popularity of coaching coincide with the rapid change in the business environment since the late ’80s.  As the business environment has changed since the late ’80s, executive coaching has also evolved in lockstep.

Organizations are recognizing the importance of executive coaching to support and develop senior executives to survive and thrive in the VUCA world of business today.  That is the reason for the explosive growth and high popularity of executive coaching in organizations.

What is the difference between executive coaching and leadership coaching?

The word executive generally refers to someone in a senior position in an organization – usually at the C-suite level – CEOs and board of directors, etc.  Executive coaches were hired for these senior leaders to support them and help them be more effective in the dynamic business environment.  However, as coaching has become popular, and its benefits became clear, executive coaching was cascaded down to multiple organizations.  Today, executive coaching is an essential part of leadership development for leaders at all levels – from C-suite all the way down to first-line managers.  Today, executive coaching is a part of the competency framework, talent management, and learning and development functions in most large organizations.

The desired outcome of coaching has also evolved over the years.  Initially, in the 1980s, coaching was often internally used to derail behaviors or advice in specific areas.  Often the coach was internal – a person from Human Resource who would engage in the coaching.  Sometimes, an external professional was hired to advise and perspective for a specific domain knowledge like finance, business development, legal, etc.

The perception then was that if a leader was being coached, he needed to be “fixed” or “remedied.”  An executive would rarely declare in public that he was being coached.  It was a sign of “weakness.”  It meant that the leader was not capable of leading on his own and needed help!

Read: How to find the best executive coach for you or for the leaders in your organization.

world's number 1 executive coaching

The changing perception and reach of executive/leadership coaching

Since then, we have come a full circle around.  Today, a majority of coaching is used for the development of high potentials and high performers.  

Executive coaching has gone from stigma to a badge of honor.  If the organization does not include a leader in a coaching program, often the perception that the organization does not consider the leader a high potential or worthwhile to invest in a coaching program for that leader.  Often, executives may leave the organization if they believe that they are not investing enough in their continuous development.

Executive coaching has also spread geographically around the world.  Initially, most coaching engagements were in the United States and Western Europe.  Now executive coaching has spread to Asia, especially India, Africa, the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and South America.  In fact, a majority of growth in executive coaching is being contributed by these countries and regions.

Why do companies and leaders hire an executive coach?

In a study conducted by Diane E. Lewis, companies identified various reasons for hiring executive coaches. Here is the list of the top five reasons, with the percentage of respondents citing that particular reason in parentheses.

  • To develop the leadership skills of high-potential individuals (86%).
  • To improve the odds that newly promoted managers would be successful (64%).
  • To develop management and leadership skills among their technical people (59%).
  • To correct behavioral problems at the management level (70%).
  • To help leaders resolve interpersonal conflicts among employees (59%).

According to an executive coach and author Anne Marie Valerio, a typical coaching engagement helps the executive with one of the following three areas.  Almost every situation that leads to hiring an executive coach can be classified into one of these categories.

Skill development

Typically, skill development areas are either interpersonal or self-management skills.  For example, better communication with team members, ability to influence or present in front of board or investors, or better manage your own time and priorities.  Leadership is managing other people and getting results through others.  When you are dealing with people, behaviors matter a lot.  Once termed as soft skills, they now have become power skills for any executive.

Emotional intelligence – which includes competencies of self-awareness, self-regulation, social awareness, and relationship management – accounts for three-fourths or more of the difference between a high-performing executive compared with an executive whose performance is in the bottom 10th percentile.  An executive coach helps the leader become aware of the gap between his intention and impact on the team members.

Improve current performance

Enhance performance by leveraging strengths and working on improvement areas.  Performance may be hindered by the leader’s behaviors which may be problematic for team members.  According to leadership guru Marshall Goldsmith, executives and leaders are successful because of certain behaviors and despite other behaviors!  A technically brilliant leader may be abrasive or have other behavioral patterns that may offend other team members.  Working on improving such behaviors increases the effectiveness of the executive and helps improve performance.

Often executives have to take up new roles and new challenges either up the hierarchy or across to another division.  This usually happens in response to an urgent business need, and the leader has no time to prepare for the transition.  It often is the sink or swims approach.  Unfortunately, a large number of executives are unsuccessful when transitioning up or across an organization. An executive coach helps the leader transition into the new role and help him perform, increasing its value.

Develop future competencies

The pace of change today is fast and getting faster.  Organizations have to focus on current profits as well as future sustainability.  The pace of change today in the business world is fast and getting faster.  Artificial intelligence, robotics, analytics, technology are accelerating the pace of change at an unprecedented rate.  This requires the executive or the leader to keep up.  And keeping up means developing newer competencies needed to succeed in the future.

Rapid changes in political, economic, social, and technology have made it imperative for leaders to develop the future competencies.   Some examples of emerging competencies are technologically savvy and can engage a diverse workforce.

Leaders also have to look across the horizon to anticipate opportunities and threats and guide them to seize opportunities and eliminate or be prepared for the threats.  An executive coaching engagement allows the leader to take a more strategic view and develop future skills.

Read: Team coaching – Everything you wanted to know about it.

Who is the best executive coach?

Dr. Marshall Goldsmith is considered the best executive coach in the world.  Here is what some of the most respected publications think of Dr. Marshall Goldsmith.

Thinkers 50 – World’s most influential leadership thinker (2015 and 2011), top ten business thinker, top-rated executive coach (2015, 2013, and 2011).

Forbes – One of five most-respected executive coaches.

Wall Street Journal – Top ten executive educators.

American Management Association (AMA) – Fifty great leaders who have impacted the management field over the past eighty years.

INC Magazine – America’s #1 executive coach.

The Times (UK) – 15 Greatest Business Thinkers in the World.

online leadership coaching trial

Executive coaching for your leaders using Dr. Marshall Goldsmith’s stakeholder centered coaching.

We help you develop leaders in your organization using the stakeholder centered executive coaching pioneered by Dr. Marshall Goldsmith – the world’s number one leadership thinker and executive coach to the CEOs of the Fortune 500 companies.

You get the exact same executive coaching for your leaders, which Dr. Marshall Goldsmith has used for his Fortune 500 CEO clients.  In fact, we guarantee that the leader will improve measurably, or you don’t have to pay.

We help leaders to develop skills, help their performance, and help them develop future competencies. We offer guaranteed and measurable leadership development coaching along with emotional intelligence assessment to develop specific competencies.

NAL Triple Advantage Leadership Coaching

That delivers guaranteed and measurable leadership growth.  It is based on a stakeholder-centered coaching process with a 95% effectiveness rate (in a study of 11000 leaders on 4 continents).  It is used by companies ranging from startups to 150 of the Fortune 500 companies to develop their leaders.

Here are some of the salient benefits of NAL Triple Advantage Leadership Coaching

Time and resource-efficient: The leader does not have to leave work to attend training programs.  We go to the leader and her team.  And it only takes 1.5 hours per month. The rest of the time, the leader is working to implement with her team.

Separate and customized improvement areas for each leader: Every leader is different.  One size fits all approach doesn’t work.  Individual development areas for each leader aligned to the business strategy.

Involves entire team: Unlike most leadership programs, NAL Triple Advantage Leadership Coaching involves the leader’s entire team, and it has a cascading effect – increasing the team effectiveness and improving organizational culture.

The leader becomes the coach: for continuous improvement for leaders themselves and their teams. It is like kaizen for your leadership development.

Cost-Effective: Our entire one-year coaching engagement often costs less than sending the leader to a short duration leadership program at any reputed B school.

Guaranteed and measurable leadership growth: as assessed – not by us – but anonymously rated by the leader’s own team members.

Pay us only after we deliver results!: We work with many of our clients on a pay for results basis.  What does it mean?  If the leaders don’t improve, you simply don’t have to pay us.

Schedule an exploratory 15-minute conversation with our leadership adviser today

Click the button below.

SCHEDULE NOW!
Categories
Leadership

How can leaders inspire extreme ownership and transform organizational culture?

What is extreme ownership?  As a leader would you like to inspire an organizational culture of “extreme ownership” in your team members?  What kind of organizational culture would it create for your teams?  What can it do for team performance and team effectiveness? How will it help improve your leaders in 2020 and spark an organizational culture transformation in your organization?

Ramadi, the hot spot of insurgency during the Iraq war

In the spring of 2006, Jocko Willink, a Navy seal for US armed forces, was stationed in Ramadi, Iraq.  Ramadi was the hotspot of insurgency in post-war Iraq.  Terrorists controlled the Ramadi area by any means necessary – urban warfare, torture, murders, and even rapes.  US forces suffered heavy casualties as the terrorists were improvising and using advanced tactics.  Jocko Willink and Leif Babin’s Navy SEAL unit faced an impossible mission: help U.S. forces secure Ramadi, a city deemed “all but lost.”

The unfortunate incident that inspired extreme ownership

One morning Jocko was in charge of an operation in a suburb of Ramadi. It was a combined and complex operation involving the navy seals, US army soldiers, and US marines. Their instruction was to clear outbuildings and set up positions to fight the enemy.  Friendly Iraqi soldiers were to arrive later to provide additional support.

Jocko’s team, the navy seals were engaged in a heavy gunfight while attempting to evacuate a particular building.  Jocko heard on the radio that a friendly Iraqi soldier was shot.  The team immediately called in for the support of heavily armored ground troops and air support to strike that particular building. With the morning fog came the fog of war – bringing with it the chaos and the confusion – gunfire, enemy attacks, screaming, wounded and bloodied soldiers, and even death.

A big mistake

Even through this confusion, Jocko’s gut instinct told him that something wasn’t right.  He called in to hold off on the airstrike and went to the building to assess the situation himself.  He discovered that the navy seal team wasn’t firing on the enemy, but firing on their own men inside the building!  Call it the confusion of war, an error of judgment, bad luck or even blame it on Murphy’s law – But Jocko’s team had committed one of the cardinal crimes of war – firing on their own people!  The causalities were one Iraqi soldier dead, two wounded, one navy seal injured and everyone on the team shaken!

When Jocko went back to the command center, he found an email waiting from his commanding officer asking him to shut down all operations and wait for them to arrive at the scene. Unfortunately, the email had arrived just after he had left to go to the scene of the event and check things himself.   Now Jocko had to report the incident up the chain of command, and there would be a postmortem done.

Who was at fault? Pass on the blame or take extreme ownership?

The senior officers were determined to find out what went wrong and who was responsible.  Jocko had to be ready for his debriefing.  He understood that someone had to be held accountable and would be fired for this horrible incident.  He went over the details of the terrible incident to figure out what may have caused this grave error in the planning and execution of this mission.  He found that there was plenty of blame to go around!

But he didn’t feel that it was the right thing to do.  He wondered what would happen to the morale of the team if he pointed fingers at some of the team members whose actions may have contributed to this grave incident.  When he was just minutes away from the debriefing, he suddenly realized whose fault it was.  There was a single person responsible for this entire mess.

When he walked into the debriefing room, the senior officers and his team members, including the wounded navy seals, were eagerly waiting for his answers.  Jocko’s commanding officers and his team members may have expected finger-pointing and blame to be passed on to others.  Commanding officers may have been ready to “investigate” him and team members may have been ready to “defend” themselves.

extreme ownership

Extreme Ownership

Jocko said that he knew that there was a single person he had identified who was responsible for this unfortunate and horrible incident.  Who was that person?  Jocko said that it was his OWN fault. As the leader in charge of the operation, he took complete and full responsibility for the incident. If the seniors thought that he should be fired, he was ready to accept the punishment.  He understood clearly that if his team had to put things behind and bounce back to normal, he himself had to take complete and total responsibility.  But when Jocko took “extreme ownership” and complete blame, something strange started happening!

Inspiring Extreme Ownership in others

One after another, the team members raised their hands and shouted that it was their fault!  “I didn’t keep the Iraqi soldiers updated of our mission.”  “I didn’t pass the information over the radio quick enough.”  “I didn’t identify my target correctly and shot an Iraqi soldier.”  Many of the team members admitted to their role that may have caused things to get out of hand.  Instead of passing on the blame or defending themselves, the team members were taking responsibility for their own actions!

Jocko didn’t get fired! Because Jocko had taken full responsibility, the team members trusted him even more than before.  Their respect for Jocko had increased.  They realized that Jocko really “had their back” and would never dodge responsibility and would never pass the blame.  When their leader took “extreme ownership” it inspired the team to take ownership instead of passing on the blame.

Imagine what would have happened if Jocko had passed on the blame to other members on the team.  Would it have inspired ownership?  Would it have helped build trust?  Would the team’s subsequent performance be hampered?  That is the difference between a leader taking complete responsibility and ownership – even when there are things that are out of the leader’s control – vs. leader passing on the blame and creating a toxic leadership culture.

Jocko then promised to everyone that he would never let this happen under his watch.  He outlined his plan – new tactics, new procedures, and new training – to ensure that this never happened again.

organizational culture transformation

Extreme Ownership is a game-changer in 2020

What a leader does when things go wrong, can either inspire an organizational culture of ownership or instigate an organizational culture of blame and passing the buck.  As a leader, don’t make excuses.  Don’t pass on the blame.  Don’t let your ego get the better of you.  Swallow your pride. Even when there are situations and circumstances that are beyond your control, take complete responsibility! For everything! Your mistakes, your shortcomings, and team results.  Don’t we take complete responsibility for successes as a leader?  Why not take complete responsibility for the problems and failures?

In battle and in business as well as in life – a leader must take “extreme ownership”.  It is a game-changer!  It inspires the team members to do the same. It transforms team culture. It lights the fire in people to take their performance to the next level.  It is a leadership super-power!

Read: Leadership development plan example template – a real-life case study

How do your extreme ownership as your organization culture?

Would you like the leaders in your organization to become better leaders?  Take more responsibility and ownership instead of passing the buck?  Even extreme ownership like Jocko Willink did?  We help leaders do just that – take ownership of their behaviors and outcomes through the process of feedback and feed-forward using Dr. Marshall Goldsmith’s stakeholder centered leadership coaching.

Why is coaching important in leadership development? How is it beneficial?  Leadership coaching is the most effective way to ensure that leadership improvement takes place.  That leader takes ownership and responsibility for her behavior and results.  Executive education and training programs help in creating awareness for change – however behavior change requires customized solutions and consistent follow-up and accountability, which executive coaching provides by its design.

Marshall Goldsmith executive coaching is one of the best leadership development programs available in India and worldwide through a network of more than 3500 coaches who provide the same consistent executive coaching process that has been used by many of the Fortune 500 companies for their leadership development coaching programs.

We offer Marshall Goldsmith coaching in India, the middle east, and southeast Asia.  It is the best coaching program in India because it is exactly the same executive coaching process used by Marshall Goldsmith to coach CEOs of Fortune 500 companies worldwide and we guarantee measurable leadership growth or you don’t pay at all.

Here are some of the features of Marshall Goldsmith executive coaching program

  • Guaranteed, measurable leadership growth as assessed – not by us – but by the leader’s own stakeholders
  • Unlike leadership training or executive education programs, the entire team will be involved while doing their day to day work
  • The leader becomes the coach and it has a cascading effect on the team increasing the team effectiveness and improving organizational culture
  • It is a system for continuous improvement for leaders themselves and their teams – although it is leadership coaching for the individual leader, the benefit of team coaching is realized through the involvement of the entire team
  • In a study of 11,000 leaders on 4 continents – 95% of the leaders using this leadership coaching process improved!
  • This is the exact same executive coaching process that has been used by 150 of the Fortune 500 companies to grow their leaders through CEO coaching and leadership coaching at C-suite levels
  • We are so confident of the process that we work on a no growth no pay basis (don’t try that with other vendors, lol!)

Schedule an exploratory 15-minute conversation with our leadership adviser today

Click the button below

SCHEDULE NOW!

Or call/WhatsApp on

For India :  +91-6352681614

For USA   :  +1-772-801-6109

References

Book – Extreme ownership

Deliberate practice article by James Clear – https://jamesclear.com/deliberate-practice-theory

 

 

Categories
Leadership

Leadership practice make you a better leader? Right? Wrong! Deliberate practice does!

Does practice make you better? Does leadership practice make you a better leader?  Well, mostly not!  For example, doctors 20 years into their career are no better in their skills than doctors who are only 5 years into their careers.

When you are a novice, you get better with practice. But only till you reach a satisfactory level of performance.  After that point, more practice doesn’t make you any better, whether it is clinical practice, leadership practice or anything else. Unless you use the deliberate practice! 

Deliberate leadership practice makes you a better leader!  Deliberate practice makes you perfect in anything you want to get better at.

Does leadership practice make you better?

We all know the adage – practice makes you perfect.  Does it really?  If you have been a doctor for 20 years, you have 20 years of practice under your belt. 

Would you not be better than doctors who only have been practicing for 5 years? Obviously the more the practice, the better you are supposed to get.

A study concluded that doctors 20 years into their career are no better in their skills than doctors who are only 5 years into their careers. 

What could be the reason for this?  When you are a novice, you get better with practice. But only till you reach a satisfactory level of performance.  After that point, more practice doesn’t make you any better, whether it is clinical practice, leadership practice or anything else.

Unless you use the deliberate practice!  Deliberate leadership practice makes you a better leader!  Deliberate practice makes you better at anything.  Read on to find out more about deliberate practice.

A study by Anders Ericsson

Eminent researcher and psychologist Anders conducted some research on the effect of practice on performance.  He recruited Steve Faloona, an undergraduate student from Carnegie Mellon University to conduct an experiment on deliberate practice. 

For a period of one hour, Steve had to listen to a string of random digits and try to recall and repeat the digits only from his memory.  He started with recalling 6 digits.  When he was successful in recalling 6 digits for a few repetitions, he would then get 7 digit strings to recall. 

In case he had difficulty recalling 7 digits for a few repetitions, he would go back to recalling only 6 digits.  Thus Steve was always pushing his limits and working at the end of his comfort zone.

We estimate the short term or working memory to hold just 7 bits of information and Steve could soon recall 7 digit numbers with ease.  Then he sort of hit a wall and had difficulty recalling 8 digit strings of numbers. 

It would frustrate him, but he kept coming back week after week and practicing for an hour.  Then, one day, he had a breakthrough – he went from being able to recall 7 digits to recalling 8, 9, 10 and even 11 digit numbers by the end of that single one-hour session!

This pattern of hitting a wall, getting frustrated, still continuing the practice, and then suddenly getting a breakthrough happened routinely as he kept working on trying to recall more and more digits from his working memory. 

He got stuck at being able to recall 22 digits, then suddenly hit a breakthrough.  The same thing happened at 34 digits and so on.  By the end of his 200th session, Steve was able to recall numbers that were 82 digits long!  That is 75 more digits and seven times longer strings of numbers than the perceived limitations of human memory estimated at 7 bits of information!

The remarkable results of deliberate practice

Anders credits the four components of deliberate practice for this remarkable achievement by Steve and Dario.  As a result of the deliberate practice using the 4 steps, Steve’s brain came up with creative ways of thinking and remembering the digits of the numbers.  One such idea was to think of the numbers attached to the branch of a tree. 

Another idea was to see the 4 digits of a long number as a single chunk.  When he was recalling 22 digit numbers, he had learned to chunk 6 digit numbers together.   Without deliberate practice involving these 4 steps, it is difficult for the brain to come up with new techniques and it is not possible to achieve such breakthroughs.

Anders repeated the same experiment with Dario, who was Steve’s friend.  Dario learned much faster and was able to remember 20 digit numbers within just a few sessions.  Why? 

Because Steve had taught him how to use his mental representations and techniques!  Dario also developed some of his own techniques.  With the head start of Steve’s techniques and coming up with some of his own, Dario was able to recall 100 digit numbers!

Therein lies the second amazing idea for performance improvement.  Get a coach!  Anders Ericsson had found this to be the formula for breakthrough performance improvement.

What is Deliberate Practice?

According to author James Clear – “Deliberate practice refers to a special type of practice that is purposeful and systematic. While regular practice might include mindless repetitions, deliberate practice requires focused attention and is conducted with the specific goal of improving performance.”

  1. Well-defined goal and motivation to achieve it
  2. Intense focus and repeated practice
  3. Immediate feedback – You cannot manage what you don’t measure – Peter Drucker. Feedback requires that we measure and compare each repetition with the previous one and work on getting just a little better.
  4. Working at the end of the comfort zone – stretch or growth zone, and not hitting the panic zone

Read: How to become a better leader? What does it take? or How leaders become leaders – Why what you know about leadership development may be wrong!

The Four components of deliberate practice

1. A well-defined short term goal

The goal for Steve was obvious.  When he was able to successfully recall 12 digits, recalling 13 digits was immediately the next goal.

2. Practice sessions with an intense focus

He consistently practiced recalling the digits one hour per day.

3. Immediate feedback

Steve received immediate feedback whether he got the digits right or not.

4. Working at the edge of the comfort zone

When Steve extended his abilities to remember 10 digit numbers, he would move up to recalling 11 digits.  On the other hand, if he failed to recall a 10 digit number for a few times, he would move down to recalling 9 digit numbers.  The growth zone lies between the comfort zone and the panic zone.  Steve was consistently working within his growth zone.

Our Marshall Goldsmith stakeholder centered coaching – MGSCC for short – uses these two concepts perfectly, deliberate leadership practice and services of an executive coach.

Deliberate leadership practice and having a coach!

That probably is the reason that Marshall Goldsmith stakeholder centered executive coaching has a success rate of 95% and is considered the best executive coaching program in India and around the world.  Executive coaching is available through a network of more than 3500 coaches who provide the same consistent executive coaching process that has been used by many of the Fortune 500 companies for their leadership development coaching programs.

Read: Top elements of leadership development

This executive coaching uses the four components of deliberate practice along with a leadership coach.

  1. Focus on one or two specific areas of improvement instead of talking about general principles and theories of leadership
  2. Intense focus on improving just these two areas – focus delivers results.
  3. Using stakeholders to get immediate feedback and reinforcement – there can be little improvement without measurement and feedback.
  4. Growth lies outside of the comfort zone! When leaders practice their new behaviors to get better, it is uncomfortable in the beginning. But with enough practice and feedback, these behaviors become second nature for the leader.  They become part of the skill set of the leader.

We offer Marshall Goldsmith coaching in India, the middle east, and southeast Asia.  It is the best coaching program in India because it is exactly the same executive coaching process used by Marshall Goldsmith to coach CEOs of Fortune 500 companies worldwide and we guarantee measurable leadership growth or you don’t pay at all.

Here are some of the features of Marshall Goldsmith executive coaching program

  • Guaranteed, measurable leadership growth as assessed – not by us – but by the leader’s own stakeholders
  • Unlike leadership training or executive education programs, the entire team will be involved while doing their day to day work
  • The leader becomes the coach and it has a cascading effect on the team increasing the team effectiveness and improving organizational culture
  • It is a system for continuous improvement for leaders themselves and their teams – although it is leadership coaching for the individual leader, the benefit of team coaching is realized through the involvement of the entire team
  • In a study of 11,000 leaders on 4 continents – 95% of the leaders using this leadership coaching process improved!
  • This is the exact same executive coaching process that has been used by 150 of the Fortune 500 companies to grow their leaders through CEO coaching and leadership coaching at C-suite levels
  • We are so confident of the process that we work on a no growth no pay basis (don’t try that with other vendors, lol!)

Schedule an exploratory 15-minute conversation with our leadership adviser today

Click the button below

SCHEDULE NOW!

Or call/WhatsApp on

For India :  +91-6352681614

For USA   :  +1-772-801-6109

 

Categories
Leadership

Why leadership training fails and the fail-safe solution for it

The statistics on the effectiveness of leadership training and executive education programs are both shocking and depressing!  Despite a plethora of executive education and leadership training programs and many consultants offering them, most executive education and leadership development programs waste time and money! Why does leadership training fail?  Because there is a fundamental problem with them!  Read on to find out what this problem is and how to fix it.

A fundamental problem with leadership programs

Executive education and leadership development programs have a fundamental problem. What is it? They often assume that leadership knowing equals leadership doing!

Unfortunately, knowing is not the same as doing!  Neither in life nor in leadership. We know many things, but we only consistently do a minuscule of the things we know!

Let me give you an example that I often use in my training sessions to drive home this point.  “How many of you have attempted to lose a few pounds?”

Often many people raise their hands when I ask this question.  During adulthood, most of us have put on a few extra pounds that we want to shed.

Knowing is NOT the same as doing!

Then I ask – “Do you have any suggestions for me to lose a few pounds around my waist?”  And I get a lot of suggestions like – eat more fruits, more raw vegetables, cut down on sugar, exercise more, eat mindfully, join a gym, take the stairs instead of the elevator, walk 10,000 steps daily, and on and on.

Most of them are usually excellent and useful suggestions. I then say – “Thank you for the lovely and useful suggestions!”.  My next question is – “How many of you consistently implement one or more of these suggestions regularly?”

Very few people raise their hands in answer to this question!  Knowing how to lose weight is not the same as doing it consistently enough to get the desired outcome.

Read: Is your leadership development effective? Or is the money going down the drain?

Awareness is NOT the same as Action!

There is high awareness amongst Americans about weight loss.  Diet books are popular and are often on the list of best-selling books.

Americans are buying more and more diet books than ever, and yet there are more obese people in America today than ever!  People simply do not lose weight by reading a diet book!

More diet books are sold than ever, yet more Americans are obese than ever!

Leadership is no different.  The fundamentally flawed assumption in leadership training and executive education programs is that attending a course for a few days and knowing about some leadership skills and tools will translate into job leadership behavior change.  Unfortunately, leadership development doesn’t happen this way.
“Leadership awareness may happen in a training program – leadership development occurs when a leader is at her work, interacting with her team! “ – Tushar Vakil.

Approach leadership development like a fitness regime and fix why leadership training fails

We should approach leadership development like a fitness regime.  If we want to get fit, a one-week routine at the gym once or twice a year, just doesn’t work!

 

We should approach leadership development like a fitness regime.  If we want to get fit, a one-week routine at the gym once or twice a year, just doesn’t work!

We need to work out regularly, probably daily. The exercise routine should be customized based on our individual needs and not a standard curriculum of one size fits all.  Our diet regime should be designed similarly.   Despite the help and despite the good intentions, we will fail to go to the gym.

Failing, dusting ourselves off, and getting “back on the wagon” should be part of the fitness routine’s design and shouldn’t come as a surprise.  Why?

That is how human beings learn and form habits.  Losing weight and keeping it off is a process and not an event – and so is leadership development!  It takes time, effort, and commitment.

Hiring a personal trainer for our fitness regime increases our chances of losing weight and getting fit by a wide margin.  How wide a margin?  Research studies have shown that hiring a personal trainer increases your success rate by a whopping 1100%!

Read: The Swiss army knife of talent development is leadership coaching!

“Personal trainer” for your leadership development – to fix why leadership training fails

Using Marshall Goldsmith’s stakeholder-centered coaching process, our leadership coaching program is like hiring a personal trainer for your fitness regime!  Here, the coach is the “personal trainer” for our leadership growth!  He will help you shed leadership fat and build some leadership muscles.

The leadership coach will help us reduce or eliminate leadership bottlenecks and build on our leadership strengths.  And best of all – it guarantees results.  If there are no improvements in leadership behavior, there is simply no charge.  Period!

Executive education and training programs help in creating awareness for change – however, behavior change requires customized solutions and consistent follow-up and accountability, which executive coaching provides by its design.

Guaranteed and measurable leadership growth 

Would you like to develop leaders in your organization?  We use Marshall Goldsmith’s stakeholder centered coaching process to deliver measurable and guaranteed leadership growth.

NAL Triple Advantage Leadership Coaching

That delivers guaranteed and measurable leadership growth.  It is based on a stakeholder-centered coaching process with a 95% effectiveness rate (in a study or 11000 leaders on 4 continents).  It is used by companies ranging from startups to 150 of the Fortune 500 companies to develop their leaders.

Here are some of the salient benefits of NAL Triple Advantage Leadership Coaching

Time and resource-efficient: The leader does not have to leave work to attend training programs.  We go to the leader and her team.  And it only takes 1.5 hours per month. The rest of the time, the leader is working to implement with her team.

Separate and customized improvement areas for each leader: Every leader is different.  One size fits all approach doesn’t work.  Individual development areas for each leader aligned to the business strategy.

Involves entire team: Unlike most leadership programs, NAL Triple Advantage Leadership Coaching involves the leader’s entire team, and it has a cascading effect – increasing the team effectiveness and improving organizational culture.

The leader becomes the coach: for continuous improvement for leaders themselves and their teams. It is like kaizen for your leadership development.

Cost-Effective: Our entire one-year coaching engagement often costs less than sending the leader to a short duration leadership program at any reputed B school.

Guaranteed and measurable leadership growth: as assessed – not by us – but anonymously rated by the leader’s own team members.

Pay us only after we deliver results!: We work with many of our clients on a pay for results basis.  What does it mean?  If the leaders don’t improve, you simply don’t have to pay us.

Schedule an exploratory 15-minute conversation with our leadership adviser today

Click the button below.

SCHEDULE NOW!

 

Contact us anytime

Tushar Vakil

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get my tips directly into your inbox every Monday morning.

Visit us on social networks:

© Copyright 2024 newageleadership.com | All Rights Reserved.