Tushar Vakil

Categories
Leadership

Everything you ever wanted to know about executive coaching

What is executive coaching? Difference between executive coaching & leadership coaching? Why do companies hire executive coaches? Who is the best executive coach? Read the article to find out.

What is executive coaching?

Leaders have a high level of responsibility for the current success and future sustainability of any organization.  Organizations invest in the development of such leaders.  Traditionally, executive education, training programs, mentoring, challenging assignments, job shadowing, etc., are the tools used for leadership development in organizations.

Executive coaching is a recent entrant in the list of tools for leadership development in organizations.   Executive coaching focuses on the leader’s personal development for him/her to be a more effective leader.

Executive coaching is a one on one relationship between a client (a leader) and a professionally qualified coach, that focuses on increasing the self-awareness of the client’s own thoughts, behaviors, and actions, and its impact on his/her effectiveness as a leader, and to change them for the leader to become a more effective leader.

The Center for Creative Leadership’s Handbook on Coaching defines the intent of coaching as to “help leaders understand themselves more fully so that they can draw on their strengths and use them more effectively and intentionally, improve identified development needs, and develop untested potential.”

Executive Coaching involves helping leaders gain clarity about their own motivations, aspirations, and commitment to change, so that they can lead more effectively.”

The ultimate outcome of executive coaching is to help the leader make a sustainable behavior change, leading to improved performance and better relationships at work.

The origin of the word coach

Kocs was a small town in Hungary. In the early 15th century, the town was known for making a light wooden enclosure on wheels pulled by horses and used for transportation. 

Now, this light wooden enclosure was state-of-the art and much lighter and faster than anything available then.  Hence it became popular and later spread all across Europe over the next century and was called kocsi. The Hungarian word “kocsi”, means “of Kocs” or from Kocs or made in Kocs.

The Spanish and Portuguese coach, the German Kutsche, and the Slovak koč and Czech kočár and the English word coach – all probably derive from the Hungarian word kocsi. 

These coaches arrived in England around 1580.  Later, in the 19th century, the term coach was used for U.S. railway carriages. In the 20th century, the term was used to describe horse-driven carriages and later motor coaches that eventually evolved into automobiles.

In its literal sense, the word coach is a vehicle that takes a person from where they are to somewhere they want to go.  In the present day, the word coach keeps the same analogy. A coach helps an individual take him from where he currently is to where he wants to go. 

Not in the sense of going from one place to another, but in the sense of going from their current situation (career, physical, financial, emotional, etc.) to where they want to go – the desired goal – to be in a better shape, improve their performance, improve their finances, relate better with people, etc.

A brief history of modern coaching

The sports coach

When the word coach is used for a layperson, they usually think of a professional sports coach. Coaching, for the most of the 20th century, was associated with sports. Whether it is an individual sport like tennis or a team sport like football, it is customary to have a coach in any professional sport. 

The player herself may be talented, but to compete and win at higher levels, she will utilize a professional coach’s services.  There is no stigma attached to having a coach; rather, working with a renowned coach is highly desired by any athlete.

But it wasn’t always like that.  In the earlier part of the 20th century, they considered the concept of hiring a professional coach to improve the performance of an athlete to be dishonorable and disgraceful. An athlete should have “natural” talent and should not need any external help. 

Today, no individual athlete or a team would even think of participating in any sport at a competitive level without a coach’s help.  A good coach helps the individual athlete or a team perform at their best.

Executive coaching in organizations

A similar evolution happened with professional coaching in the business environment also.  Coaching in the current form started in the late 80s and early 90s. Before that, mentoring and hiring external consultants was prevalent but wasn’t termed as coaching and had a different purpose. 

There was also a stigma attached to admitting that an individual needed the help of a “consultant” to help the leader overcome some form of “weakness.”  

In the early years of executive coaching, hiring a coach for the executive in an organization was considered to be something that the executive was usually not proud to share with others.  The perception was that if they assigned an executive a coach – he needed to be “fixed” or “remedied.”

Over the last decade or so, executive coaching has gained immense popularity.  A majority of Fortune 500 companies use executive coaching as part of their leadership development initiatives. 

As executive coaching has gained popularity, the availability of executive coaches has also increased significantly.  Today, senior leaders consider executive coaching a badge of honor.  It conveys to the leader and the others that the company considers them worthwhile to invest in their development via coaching.

Why is executive coaching so popular?

From the second world war until the Berlin wall’s falling in 1989 – businesses were predominantly industrial and manufacturing in nature.  The business operation was predictable, and the pace of change was quite “reasonable” to manage.  Over the last three decades, there have been many political, economic, social, and technological changes.  They have impacted the way business is done.

Here are some of the significant factors contributing to these changes in the business environment. 

Globalization

Advances in technology, communication, internet, and supply chain efficiency meant that a large company could produce the goods anywhere globally, where it is the most cost-effective, and sell them anywhere in the world, where it is the most profitable.  It also meant that your competitor maybe anyone around the world who can produce and deliver the goods or services cheaper, faster, or better than your company.  Businesses became global, and so did the competition.

Leaner and flatter organizational structure

Organizations are leaner and flatter.  Less number of employees means more demand for existing employees.  Flatter and less hierarchical organizations mean more independent teams that are more responsive to the changes.

The fast pace of change is getting faster.

Before the 1980s, the businesses had long periods of stability followed by intermittent change and then another stable period.  Today, with the aid of technology, change, innovation, and disruption have become a norm.  Transition is a continuous process.  The pace of change is fast and getting faster.

Knowledgeable and demanding customers

With the availability of any information over the internet, consumers have become knowledgeable, savvy, and demanding. This puts an additional burden on businesses to deliver value to customers.

Multi-generational multi-cultural and multinational workforce

After the fall of the Berlin wall, businesses have had the opportunity to expand globally in areas that were not accessible due to regulations.  They have also had to hire a workforce that was multinational, multi-cultural, and multi-generational.  Engaging and managing such a diverse workforce needed a new set of skills on the parts of leaders.

High demand, competition, and turnover of talented employees

As businesses have expanded over the globe, there is an increased demand for talented employees.  In the 50’s and ’60s, there was lifetime employment for any employee and probably with the same company.  Today, no one expects lifetime employment, neither the company nor the employee.  Employees are mobile geographically, across industries, and across companies.  As a result, talented employees are in high demand.  Businesses have to work hard to attract and retain talented employees.

Increased pressure on executives to deliver results

All of these factors have a significant impact on businesses.  They have also placed an enormous amount of stress on the leaders expected to navigate this complex environment and deliver value to stakeholders in terms of revenue, profits, and customer satisfaction.

A new business environment needed a new approach.

The world, and consequently businesses, have become more complex, global, and subject to continuous change.   Although the term VUCA  (volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous) was originally used by the United States military to describe the extreme conditions in Iraq and Afghanistan, VUCA accurately describes the present day’s business environment.  VUCA world has also forced the change in leadership style from autocratic and to more of a catalyst, facilitator, and coach.  In fact, the coaching style of leadership is both highly desired and highly effective to lead in a VUCA world.

The advent and the rise in popularity of coaching coincide with the rapid change in the business environment since the late ’80s.  As the business environment has changed since the late ’80s, executive coaching has also evolved in lockstep.

Organizations are recognizing the importance of executive coaching to support and develop senior executives to survive and thrive in the VUCA world of business today.  That is the reason for the explosive growth and high popularity of executive coaching in organizations.

What is the difference between executive coaching and leadership coaching?

The word executive generally refers to someone in a senior position in an organization – usually at the C-suite level – CEOs and board of directors, etc.  Executive coaches were hired for these senior leaders to support them and help them be more effective in the dynamic business environment.  However, as coaching has become popular, and its benefits became clear, executive coaching was cascaded down to multiple organizations.  Today, executive coaching is an essential part of leadership development for leaders at all levels – from C-suite all the way down to first-line managers.  Today, executive coaching is a part of the competency framework, talent management, and learning and development functions in most large organizations.

The desired outcome of coaching has also evolved over the years.  Initially, in the 1980s, coaching was often internally used to derail behaviors or advice in specific areas.  Often the coach was internal – a person from Human Resource who would engage in the coaching.  Sometimes, an external professional was hired to advise and perspective for a specific domain knowledge like finance, business development, legal, etc.

The perception then was that if a leader was being coached, he needed to be “fixed” or “remedied.”  An executive would rarely declare in public that he was being coached.  It was a sign of “weakness.”  It meant that the leader was not capable of leading on his own and needed help!

Read: How to find the best executive coach for you or for the leaders in your organization.

world's number 1 executive coaching

The changing perception and reach of executive/leadership coaching

Since then, we have come a full circle around.  Today, a majority of coaching is used for the development of high potentials and high performers.  

Executive coaching has gone from stigma to a badge of honor.  If the organization does not include a leader in a coaching program, often the perception that the organization does not consider the leader a high potential or worthwhile to invest in a coaching program for that leader.  Often, executives may leave the organization if they believe that they are not investing enough in their continuous development.

Executive coaching has also spread geographically around the world.  Initially, most coaching engagements were in the United States and Western Europe.  Now executive coaching has spread to Asia, especially India, Africa, the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and South America.  In fact, a majority of growth in executive coaching is being contributed by these countries and regions.

Why do companies and leaders hire an executive coach?

In a study conducted by Diane E. Lewis, companies identified various reasons for hiring executive coaches. Here is the list of the top five reasons, with the percentage of respondents citing that particular reason in parentheses.

  • To develop the leadership skills of high-potential individuals (86%).
  • To improve the odds that newly promoted managers would be successful (64%).
  • To develop management and leadership skills among their technical people (59%).
  • To correct behavioral problems at the management level (70%).
  • To help leaders resolve interpersonal conflicts among employees (59%).

According to an executive coach and author Anne Marie Valerio, a typical coaching engagement helps the executive with one of the following three areas.  Almost every situation that leads to hiring an executive coach can be classified into one of these categories.

Skill development

Typically, skill development areas are either interpersonal or self-management skills.  For example, better communication with team members, ability to influence or present in front of board or investors, or better manage your own time and priorities.  Leadership is managing other people and getting results through others.  When you are dealing with people, behaviors matter a lot.  Once termed as soft skills, they now have become power skills for any executive.

Emotional intelligence – which includes competencies of self-awareness, self-regulation, social awareness, and relationship management – accounts for three-fourths or more of the difference between a high-performing executive compared with an executive whose performance is in the bottom 10th percentile.  An executive coach helps the leader become aware of the gap between his intention and impact on the team members.

Improve current performance

Enhance performance by leveraging strengths and working on improvement areas.  Performance may be hindered by the leader’s behaviors which may be problematic for team members.  According to leadership guru Marshall Goldsmith, executives and leaders are successful because of certain behaviors and despite other behaviors!  A technically brilliant leader may be abrasive or have other behavioral patterns that may offend other team members.  Working on improving such behaviors increases the effectiveness of the executive and helps improve performance.

Often executives have to take up new roles and new challenges either up the hierarchy or across to another division.  This usually happens in response to an urgent business need, and the leader has no time to prepare for the transition.  It often is the sink or swims approach.  Unfortunately, a large number of executives are unsuccessful when transitioning up or across an organization. An executive coach helps the leader transition into the new role and help him perform, increasing its value.

Develop future competencies

The pace of change today is fast and getting faster.  Organizations have to focus on current profits as well as future sustainability.  The pace of change today in the business world is fast and getting faster.  Artificial intelligence, robotics, analytics, technology are accelerating the pace of change at an unprecedented rate.  This requires the executive or the leader to keep up.  And keeping up means developing newer competencies needed to succeed in the future.

Rapid changes in political, economic, social, and technology have made it imperative for leaders to develop the future competencies.   Some examples of emerging competencies are technologically savvy and can engage a diverse workforce.

Leaders also have to look across the horizon to anticipate opportunities and threats and guide them to seize opportunities and eliminate or be prepared for the threats.  An executive coaching engagement allows the leader to take a more strategic view and develop future skills.

Read: Team coaching – Everything you wanted to know about it.

Who is the best executive coach?

Dr. Marshall Goldsmith is considered the best executive coach in the world.  Here is what some of the most respected publications think of Dr. Marshall Goldsmith.

Thinkers 50 – World’s most influential leadership thinker (2015 and 2011), top ten business thinker, top-rated executive coach (2015, 2013, and 2011).

Forbes – One of five most-respected executive coaches.

Wall Street Journal – Top ten executive educators.

American Management Association (AMA) – Fifty great leaders who have impacted the management field over the past eighty years.

INC Magazine – America’s #1 executive coach.

The Times (UK) – 15 Greatest Business Thinkers in the World.

online leadership coaching trial

Executive coaching for your leaders using Dr. Marshall Goldsmith’s stakeholder centered coaching.

We help you develop leaders in your organization using the stakeholder centered executive coaching pioneered by Dr. Marshall Goldsmith – the world’s number one leadership thinker and executive coach to the CEOs of the Fortune 500 companies.

You get the exact same executive coaching for your leaders, which Dr. Marshall Goldsmith has used for his Fortune 500 CEO clients.  In fact, we guarantee that the leader will improve measurably, or you don’t have to pay.

We help leaders to develop skills, help their performance, and help them develop future competencies. We offer guaranteed and measurable leadership development coaching along with emotional intelligence assessment to develop specific competencies.

NAL Triple Advantage Leadership Coaching

That delivers guaranteed and measurable leadership growth.  It is based on a stakeholder-centered coaching process with a 95% effectiveness rate (in a study of 11000 leaders on 4 continents).  It is used by companies ranging from startups to 150 of the Fortune 500 companies to develop their leaders.

Here are some of the salient benefits of NAL Triple Advantage Leadership Coaching

Time and resource-efficient: The leader does not have to leave work to attend training programs.  We go to the leader and her team.  And it only takes 1.5 hours per month. The rest of the time, the leader is working to implement with her team.

Separate and customized improvement areas for each leader: Every leader is different.  One size fits all approach doesn’t work.  Individual development areas for each leader aligned to the business strategy.

Involves entire team: Unlike most leadership programs, NAL Triple Advantage Leadership Coaching involves the leader’s entire team, and it has a cascading effect – increasing the team effectiveness and improving organizational culture.

The leader becomes the coach: for continuous improvement for leaders themselves and their teams. It is like kaizen for your leadership development.

Cost-Effective: Our entire one-year coaching engagement often costs less than sending the leader to a short duration leadership program at any reputed B school.

Guaranteed and measurable leadership growth: as assessed – not by us – but anonymously rated by the leader’s own team members.

Pay us only after we deliver results!: We work with many of our clients on a pay for results basis.  What does it mean?  If the leaders don’t improve, you simply don’t have to pay us.

Schedule an exploratory 15-minute conversation with our leadership adviser today

Click the button below.

SCHEDULE NOW!
Categories
Leadership

What stops intelligent, hard-working and driven leaders from reaching the next level of career success?

What keeps otherwise smart leaders from achieving the next level of career success?  What stops them from moving up the career ladder? What are the barriers? Marshall Goldsmith’s aptly titled book – What got you here, won’t get you there – describes some of those barriers.

Barriers to further career success

What stops intelligent, hard-working, and driven leaders from breaking through to the next level of career success?  What keeps otherwise smart people from achieving the next level of career success?  

Think about it for a moment.  What answers did you come up with?  When I ask this question to the leaders who participate in any of my leadership training programs, I get some answers.

  • Fear – Fear of failure and fear of rejection have killed more dreams than any other single factor! When we are afraid, we don’t want to take chances.  We avoid taking action. And that does not help in achieving further career success.
  • Lack of focus – We live in a world filled with continuous distractions and interruptions. The choices we have are endless.  This often overwhelms us.  Without focusing on a few things we are great at, it is difficult to achieve significant results.
  • Lack of time – Lack of time and lack of focus are closely related. When we get involved in too many things unrelated to our primary goals and focus areas, we suffer from a dual problem—lack of focus and lack of time.
  • Inability to change – The world is changing at a frenetic pace. Technology, communication, artificial intelligence, and a confluence of many other factors are speeding up the frenetic pace of change.  Unless we change and adapt, it is unlikely that we will achieve further success.  Staying in the comfort zone and not wanting to change is more a recipe for career failure than career success in a fast-changing world!

Often, the skills to reach the next level of career success are different from the skills that brought us to the career ladder’s current rung. We tend to hang on to the skills and the approach that brought us the current level of success.  Unfortunately, holding on to them and not changing is what holds us back from reaching the next level of success. What got you here won’t get you there!

The root cause that stops intelligent leaders from reaching the next level

What if I told you that all these answers are mere symptoms of a deeper root cause?  What is the root cause that prevents leaders from achieving the next level of success?  Well, the answer so obvious and in such plain sight that we often are blindsided by it and cannot see it!  What is that answer?  It is a success. Yes, that is right!  When we achieve a certain level of success in life or leadership, we stop doing many of the things that made us successful in the first place.  What got you here won’t get you there!

Read: Lessons for leaders: Henry Ford FAILURE story & bad leadership

The paradox of success – What got you here won’t get you there!

When we become successful, we become superstitious.  We want to keep doing the things that made us successful in the past.  In a fast-changing world, doing the same things doesn’t bode well. 

We become a little more fearful and stop taking chances.  What made us successful is exactly that – taking chances, trying things, failing, learning, and moving ahead.  While climbing the ladder to success, the focus was essential.  We get good at a few things.  When we are successful, we have more choices, we have more time and more money – and often, it results in a lack of focus and dilution of efforts.  Success often takes us away from the essential things that made us successful in the first place, and hence success becomes the reason for failing to get to the next level of career success and achievement.

top 20 leadership growth areas

What got you here won’t get you there! Won’t help you move up the career ladder?

Bill Gates rightly said – “Success is a lousy teacher. It makes smart people think they can’t lose.”

To quote Einstein, “We cannot solve our problems with the same level of thinking that created them.”

Marshall Goldsmith warns successful leaders in his bestselling book aptly titled – “What got you here, won’t get you there!”

Read: What Got You Here Won’t Get You There-Marshall Goldsmith-Book summary.

How to reach the next level of career success as an intelligent leader?

One of the best ways to break through to the next level of success as a leader is to work with a leadership coach.

The coach also helps the leader uncover limiting beliefs that hold the leader from reaching the next level of career success.  A leadership coach helps the leader understand their strengths and weaknesses.  The coach then helps the leader to leverage her strengths and improve weaknesses.  Executive coaching (aka leadership coaching) is the best tool for behavior change.  Leaders who support an executive coach have a better chance to move up the career ladder.

Read: How to get promoted and avoid mid-career crisis

GLA 360

NAL Triple Advantage Leadership Coaching

That delivers guaranteed and measurable leadership growth.  It is based on a stakeholder centered coaching process with a 95% effectiveness rate (in a study or 11000 leaders on 4 continents).  It is used by companies ranging from startups to 150 of the Fortune 500 companies to develop their leaders.

Here are some of the salient benefits of NAL Triple Advantage Leadership Coaching

Time and resource-efficient: The leader does not have to leave work to attend training programs.  We go to the leader and her team.  And it only takes 1.5 hours per month. The rest of the time, the leader is working to implement with her team.

Separate and customized improvement areas for each leader: Every leader is different.  One size fits all approach doesn’t work.  Individual development areas for each leader aligned to the business strategy.

Involves entire team: Unlike most leadership programs, NAL Triple Advantage Leadership Coaching involves the leader’s entire team, and it has a cascading effect – increasing the team effectiveness and improving organizational culture.

The leader becomes the coach: for continuous improvement for leaders themselves and their teams. It is like kaizen for your leadership development.

Cost-Effective: Our entire one-year coaching engagement often costs less than sending the leader to a short duration leadership program at any reputed B school.

Guaranteed and measurable leadership growth: as assessed – not by us – but anonymously rated by the leader’s own team members.

Pay us only after we deliver results!: We work with many of our clients on a pay for results basis.  What does it mean?  If the leaders don’t improve, you don’t have to pay us.

world's number 1 executive coaching

Schedule an exploratory 15-minute conversation with our leadership adviser today

Click the button below.

SCHEDULE NOW!

Categories
Leadership

How to use the compound effect to supercharge leadership development?

What is the compound effect?  What does leadership development have to do with the compound effect? Find out how to use the compound effect to supercharge leadership development.  Use, Marshall Goldsmith leadership coaching with the power of the compound effect for leadership development for leaders in your organization.

A hypothetical example to illustrate the power of the compound effect

Consider this hypothetical example that illustrates the power of the compound effect.  Imagine that I have offered you freelance programming work.  You have two options to get paid.

Two options – small improvements consistently vs. staying the same

Option 1 is to get paid $10 per week. However, if you improve your skills by 10% a week, your salary will proportionately increase by 10% every single week. 

This option requires you to improve your skills on a weekly basis.  Not a huge jump in the skill level, but small, continuous, and constant improvements.

Option 2 is to get paid a fixed amount of $5000 per month.  With this option, there is no need for any improvement in skills.  There are no additional increases either – the salary stays the same.

Which option would you choose?  Here is the table detailing the accumulated total salary for both options.

Which option would you choose?

At the end of the first month, option 1 would give you a total salary of $51.  While option 2 would fetch you a cool $5,000. 

Months two and three are equally depressing for option 1 – with a total salary of $126 and $235 respectively at the end of months two and three. At the end of 3 months, option 1 will get you a meagerly amount of $235.  Option 2 would fetch you a cool $15,000.

At the end of 1 year, option 1 would add up to $15541 while option 2 is still way ahead with $60,000.  Still lagging option 2 by a significant amount.

The power of the compound effect

However, by the end of the 16th  month, option 1 has caught up to option 1 – with $86,762 vs. $80,000 for option 2!

And by the end of the 24th-month option 1 has compounded to a cool $2.2 million while option 2 is lagging way behind with a meager sum of $120,000.

leadership development

How does the compound effect relate to our behaviors and leadership development?

Here are a few real-life options to consider.

What if you ate a chocolate bar a day for a year?  What if you instead exercised 20 minutes a day for a year?

What if you watched TV for 1 hour a day for an entire year?  What if instead, you read 10 pages of a good book a day for a year?

You would get completely different results.

Small choices + consistency + time = significant results

Seemingly small choices made daily don’t appear to make any difference in the short term.  But consistently making the small choices add up to drastically different outcomes over time.  That is the power of the compound effect.

Read: Leadership practice make you a better leader? Right? Wrong! Deliberate practice does!

development

Leadership development and the compound effect

Leadership development is no different!  Small changes in leadership behaviors applied consistently over 12-18 months add up to extraordinary results!

We offer Marshall Goldsmith’s stakeholder centered executive coaching for leadership development that capitalizes on the principle of the compound effect.  Why is coaching important for leadership development? How is it beneficial? 

Leadership coaching is the most effective way to ensure that leadership improvement takes place.  Executive education and training programs help in creating awareness for change – however behavior change requires customized solutions, consistent follow-up, and accountability. 

Executive coaching provides it by design.  Marshall Goldsmith executive coaching is one of the best leadership development programs available in India and worldwide through a network of over 3000 certified coaches who provide the same consistent executive coaching process used by many of the Fortune 500 companies for their leadership development coaching programs.

Read: How to become a better leader? What does it take?

What exactly is Marshall Goldsmith stakeholder centered executive coaching?

Here are the key defining points of Marshall Goldsmith’s stakeholder centered executive coaching process.

Help leaders to grow their leadership behavior effectiveness

Leadership behavior effectiveness is making the leader aware of his behaviors and their impact on the team members.  Behavior change helps establish better relationships, better employee engagement and improved performance of the team. 

It also includes rectifying derailing behaviors.  These are the annoying behaviors of otherwise good leaders.  Often such behaviors become a hindrance to smooth team functioning. 

Marshall Goldsmith stakeholder centered coaching helps leaders improve their own derailing behaviors and change the perception of the team members.

Often people get promoted to a higher role with little support. This is often because of business emergencies like an urgent project or a senior leader leaving the organization. 

Leadership coaching helps leaders transition into a higher role.  It also helps the leader transition across into another role within the company – when such a need arises.

leadership assessment

Through Feedback / Feedforward from Stakeholders on the Job

Feedback allows the leader to realize the blind spots that may act as their leadership bottlenecks.  Most leaders have one or more poor leadership behavior that they may not be aware of. 

Such toxic leadership behaviors often end up hurting the engagement and the performance of the leader’s team.  However, once they receive feedback, most of the focus is on feed-forward.  Feed-forward is asking for suggestions from team members (stakeholders) for improvement for the future. 

This takes the focus away from the past – which cannot be changed, to the future – which can be improved if the leader acts of stakeholder’s suggestions. 

Coaching the executive and improving on poor or toxic leadership behaviors creates effective teams and organizational culture that promotes employee engagement and performance.

As acknowledged by the stakeholders

Stakeholders are the leader’s team members who interact frequently with the leader.  They are at the receiving end of the leader’s behaviors. 

They are the “customers” of the leadership product.  No one else is in a better position than the stakeholders to assess whether the leadership behaviors are good.  They can also assess whether the behaviors are improving.  In the Marshall Goldsmith stakeholder centered executive coaching process, as the name suggests, stakeholders are at the center. 

Ultimately, they decide whether the leader has improved her behaviors.  This is done through an anonymous survey.  We consider a leader has improved, not because the leader says he has improved, or the coach says he has improved, but only when the stakeholders (through an anonymous survey) confirm that the leader has improved!

Using a well-defined process/system for 12-18 months

Marshall Goldsmith’s stakeholder centered executive coaching process is a well-defined and tried and tested process.  We design it to appeal to the leader’s ways of thinking and leverage it to help the leaders improve.  It is also a process that has been used to coach over 400,000 executives in over 60 countries – including executives from 150 of the Fortune 500 companies.  The process is highly effective.  In a survey of 11,000 leaders on four continents, over 95% of the leaders using the stakeholder centered process improved.  Marshall Goldsmith stakeholder centered executive coaching usually lasts from a minimum of six months up to a year and a half.

The compound effect of Marshall Goldsmith Stakeholder Centered Leadership Coaching

Day by day and week by week, small changes in the leader’s behaviors – based on the suggestions given by stakeholders – don’t seem like much, but compounded over the period of 12-18 months, they help the leader significantly improve her leadership effectiveness.  That is the power of compounding applied to leadership coaching using the Marshall Goldsmith stakeholder centered leadership coaching process!

Here are some features of the Marshall Goldsmith executive coaching program

  • Guaranteed, measurable leadership growth as assessed–not by us–but by the leader’s own stakeholders.
  • In addition, unlike leadership training or executive education programs, it will involve the entire team while doing their day to day work.
  • The leader becomes the coach, and it has a cascading effect on the team increasing team effectiveness and improving organizational culture.
  • It is a system for continuous improvement for leaders themselves and their teams – although it is leadership coaching for an individual leader; they realize the benefit of team coaching through the involvement of the entire team.
  • In a study of 11,000 leaders on 4 continents–95% of the leaders using this leadership coaching process improved!
  • This is the exact same executive coaching process that is used by 150 of the Fortune 500 companies to grow their leaders through CEO coaching and leadership coaching at C-suite levels
  • We are so confident of the process we work on a no growth no pay basis (don’t try that with other vendors, lol!)

Schedule an exploratory 15-minute conversation with our leadership adviser today

Click the button below

SCHEDULE NOW!

Or email us on

info@localhost

Categories
Leadership

How can leaders inspire extreme ownership and transform organizational culture?

What is extreme ownership?  As a leader would you like to inspire an organizational culture of “extreme ownership” in your team members?  What kind of organizational culture would it create for your teams?  What can it do for team performance and team effectiveness? How will it help improve your leaders in 2020 and spark an organizational culture transformation in your organization?

Ramadi, the hot spot of insurgency during the Iraq war

In the spring of 2006, Jocko Willink, a Navy seal for US armed forces, was stationed in Ramadi, Iraq.  Ramadi was the hotspot of insurgency in post-war Iraq.  Terrorists controlled the Ramadi area by any means necessary – urban warfare, torture, murders, and even rapes.  US forces suffered heavy casualties as the terrorists were improvising and using advanced tactics.  Jocko Willink and Leif Babin’s Navy SEAL unit faced an impossible mission: help U.S. forces secure Ramadi, a city deemed “all but lost.”

The unfortunate incident that inspired extreme ownership

One morning Jocko was in charge of an operation in a suburb of Ramadi. It was a combined and complex operation involving the navy seals, US army soldiers, and US marines. Their instruction was to clear outbuildings and set up positions to fight the enemy.  Friendly Iraqi soldiers were to arrive later to provide additional support.

Jocko’s team, the navy seals were engaged in a heavy gunfight while attempting to evacuate a particular building.  Jocko heard on the radio that a friendly Iraqi soldier was shot.  The team immediately called in for the support of heavily armored ground troops and air support to strike that particular building. With the morning fog came the fog of war – bringing with it the chaos and the confusion – gunfire, enemy attacks, screaming, wounded and bloodied soldiers, and even death.

A big mistake

Even through this confusion, Jocko’s gut instinct told him that something wasn’t right.  He called in to hold off on the airstrike and went to the building to assess the situation himself.  He discovered that the navy seal team wasn’t firing on the enemy, but firing on their own men inside the building!  Call it the confusion of war, an error of judgment, bad luck or even blame it on Murphy’s law – But Jocko’s team had committed one of the cardinal crimes of war – firing on their own people!  The causalities were one Iraqi soldier dead, two wounded, one navy seal injured and everyone on the team shaken!

When Jocko went back to the command center, he found an email waiting from his commanding officer asking him to shut down all operations and wait for them to arrive at the scene. Unfortunately, the email had arrived just after he had left to go to the scene of the event and check things himself.   Now Jocko had to report the incident up the chain of command, and there would be a postmortem done.

Who was at fault? Pass on the blame or take extreme ownership?

The senior officers were determined to find out what went wrong and who was responsible.  Jocko had to be ready for his debriefing.  He understood that someone had to be held accountable and would be fired for this horrible incident.  He went over the details of the terrible incident to figure out what may have caused this grave error in the planning and execution of this mission.  He found that there was plenty of blame to go around!

But he didn’t feel that it was the right thing to do.  He wondered what would happen to the morale of the team if he pointed fingers at some of the team members whose actions may have contributed to this grave incident.  When he was just minutes away from the debriefing, he suddenly realized whose fault it was.  There was a single person responsible for this entire mess.

When he walked into the debriefing room, the senior officers and his team members, including the wounded navy seals, were eagerly waiting for his answers.  Jocko’s commanding officers and his team members may have expected finger-pointing and blame to be passed on to others.  Commanding officers may have been ready to “investigate” him and team members may have been ready to “defend” themselves.

extreme ownership

Extreme Ownership

Jocko said that he knew that there was a single person he had identified who was responsible for this unfortunate and horrible incident.  Who was that person?  Jocko said that it was his OWN fault. As the leader in charge of the operation, he took complete and full responsibility for the incident. If the seniors thought that he should be fired, he was ready to accept the punishment.  He understood clearly that if his team had to put things behind and bounce back to normal, he himself had to take complete and total responsibility.  But when Jocko took “extreme ownership” and complete blame, something strange started happening!

Inspiring Extreme Ownership in others

One after another, the team members raised their hands and shouted that it was their fault!  “I didn’t keep the Iraqi soldiers updated of our mission.”  “I didn’t pass the information over the radio quick enough.”  “I didn’t identify my target correctly and shot an Iraqi soldier.”  Many of the team members admitted to their role that may have caused things to get out of hand.  Instead of passing on the blame or defending themselves, the team members were taking responsibility for their own actions!

Jocko didn’t get fired! Because Jocko had taken full responsibility, the team members trusted him even more than before.  Their respect for Jocko had increased.  They realized that Jocko really “had their back” and would never dodge responsibility and would never pass the blame.  When their leader took “extreme ownership” it inspired the team to take ownership instead of passing on the blame.

Imagine what would have happened if Jocko had passed on the blame to other members on the team.  Would it have inspired ownership?  Would it have helped build trust?  Would the team’s subsequent performance be hampered?  That is the difference between a leader taking complete responsibility and ownership – even when there are things that are out of the leader’s control – vs. leader passing on the blame and creating a toxic leadership culture.

Jocko then promised to everyone that he would never let this happen under his watch.  He outlined his plan – new tactics, new procedures, and new training – to ensure that this never happened again.

organizational culture transformation

Extreme Ownership is a game-changer in 2020

What a leader does when things go wrong, can either inspire an organizational culture of ownership or instigate an organizational culture of blame and passing the buck.  As a leader, don’t make excuses.  Don’t pass on the blame.  Don’t let your ego get the better of you.  Swallow your pride. Even when there are situations and circumstances that are beyond your control, take complete responsibility! For everything! Your mistakes, your shortcomings, and team results.  Don’t we take complete responsibility for successes as a leader?  Why not take complete responsibility for the problems and failures?

In battle and in business as well as in life – a leader must take “extreme ownership”.  It is a game-changer!  It inspires the team members to do the same. It transforms team culture. It lights the fire in people to take their performance to the next level.  It is a leadership super-power!

Read: Leadership development plan example template – a real-life case study

How do your extreme ownership as your organization culture?

Would you like the leaders in your organization to become better leaders?  Take more responsibility and ownership instead of passing the buck?  Even extreme ownership like Jocko Willink did?  We help leaders do just that – take ownership of their behaviors and outcomes through the process of feedback and feed-forward using Dr. Marshall Goldsmith’s stakeholder centered leadership coaching.

Why is coaching important in leadership development? How is it beneficial?  Leadership coaching is the most effective way to ensure that leadership improvement takes place.  That leader takes ownership and responsibility for her behavior and results.  Executive education and training programs help in creating awareness for change – however behavior change requires customized solutions and consistent follow-up and accountability, which executive coaching provides by its design.

Marshall Goldsmith executive coaching is one of the best leadership development programs available in India and worldwide through a network of more than 3500 coaches who provide the same consistent executive coaching process that has been used by many of the Fortune 500 companies for their leadership development coaching programs.

We offer Marshall Goldsmith coaching in India, the middle east, and southeast Asia.  It is the best coaching program in India because it is exactly the same executive coaching process used by Marshall Goldsmith to coach CEOs of Fortune 500 companies worldwide and we guarantee measurable leadership growth or you don’t pay at all.

Here are some of the features of Marshall Goldsmith executive coaching program

  • Guaranteed, measurable leadership growth as assessed – not by us – but by the leader’s own stakeholders
  • Unlike leadership training or executive education programs, the entire team will be involved while doing their day to day work
  • The leader becomes the coach and it has a cascading effect on the team increasing the team effectiveness and improving organizational culture
  • It is a system for continuous improvement for leaders themselves and their teams – although it is leadership coaching for the individual leader, the benefit of team coaching is realized through the involvement of the entire team
  • In a study of 11,000 leaders on 4 continents – 95% of the leaders using this leadership coaching process improved!
  • This is the exact same executive coaching process that has been used by 150 of the Fortune 500 companies to grow their leaders through CEO coaching and leadership coaching at C-suite levels
  • We are so confident of the process that we work on a no growth no pay basis (don’t try that with other vendors, lol!)

Schedule an exploratory 15-minute conversation with our leadership adviser today

Click the button below

SCHEDULE NOW!

Or call/WhatsApp on

For India :  +91-6352681614

For USA   :  +1-772-801-6109

References

Book – Extreme ownership

Deliberate practice article by James Clear – https://jamesclear.com/deliberate-practice-theory

 

 

Categories
Leadership

Why leadership training fails and the fail-safe solution for it

The statistics on the effectiveness of leadership training and executive education programs are both shocking and depressing!  Despite a plethora of executive education and leadership training programs and many consultants offering them, most executive education and leadership development programs waste time and money! Why does leadership training fail?  Because there is a fundamental problem with them!  Read on to find out what this problem is and how to fix it.

A fundamental problem with leadership programs

Executive education and leadership development programs have a fundamental problem. What is it? They often assume that leadership knowing equals leadership doing!

Unfortunately, knowing is not the same as doing!  Neither in life nor in leadership. We know many things, but we only consistently do a minuscule of the things we know!

Let me give you an example that I often use in my training sessions to drive home this point.  “How many of you have attempted to lose a few pounds?”

Often many people raise their hands when I ask this question.  During adulthood, most of us have put on a few extra pounds that we want to shed.

Knowing is NOT the same as doing!

Then I ask – “Do you have any suggestions for me to lose a few pounds around my waist?”  And I get a lot of suggestions like – eat more fruits, more raw vegetables, cut down on sugar, exercise more, eat mindfully, join a gym, take the stairs instead of the elevator, walk 10,000 steps daily, and on and on.

Most of them are usually excellent and useful suggestions. I then say – “Thank you for the lovely and useful suggestions!”.  My next question is – “How many of you consistently implement one or more of these suggestions regularly?”

Very few people raise their hands in answer to this question!  Knowing how to lose weight is not the same as doing it consistently enough to get the desired outcome.

Read: Is your leadership development effective? Or is the money going down the drain?

Awareness is NOT the same as Action!

There is high awareness amongst Americans about weight loss.  Diet books are popular and are often on the list of best-selling books.

Americans are buying more and more diet books than ever, and yet there are more obese people in America today than ever!  People simply do not lose weight by reading a diet book!

More diet books are sold than ever, yet more Americans are obese than ever!

Leadership is no different.  The fundamentally flawed assumption in leadership training and executive education programs is that attending a course for a few days and knowing about some leadership skills and tools will translate into job leadership behavior change.  Unfortunately, leadership development doesn’t happen this way.
“Leadership awareness may happen in a training program – leadership development occurs when a leader is at her work, interacting with her team! “ – Tushar Vakil.

Approach leadership development like a fitness regime and fix why leadership training fails

We should approach leadership development like a fitness regime.  If we want to get fit, a one-week routine at the gym once or twice a year, just doesn’t work!

 

We should approach leadership development like a fitness regime.  If we want to get fit, a one-week routine at the gym once or twice a year, just doesn’t work!

We need to work out regularly, probably daily. The exercise routine should be customized based on our individual needs and not a standard curriculum of one size fits all.  Our diet regime should be designed similarly.   Despite the help and despite the good intentions, we will fail to go to the gym.

Failing, dusting ourselves off, and getting “back on the wagon” should be part of the fitness routine’s design and shouldn’t come as a surprise.  Why?

That is how human beings learn and form habits.  Losing weight and keeping it off is a process and not an event – and so is leadership development!  It takes time, effort, and commitment.

Hiring a personal trainer for our fitness regime increases our chances of losing weight and getting fit by a wide margin.  How wide a margin?  Research studies have shown that hiring a personal trainer increases your success rate by a whopping 1100%!

Read: The Swiss army knife of talent development is leadership coaching!

“Personal trainer” for your leadership development – to fix why leadership training fails

Using Marshall Goldsmith’s stakeholder-centered coaching process, our leadership coaching program is like hiring a personal trainer for your fitness regime!  Here, the coach is the “personal trainer” for our leadership growth!  He will help you shed leadership fat and build some leadership muscles.

The leadership coach will help us reduce or eliminate leadership bottlenecks and build on our leadership strengths.  And best of all – it guarantees results.  If there are no improvements in leadership behavior, there is simply no charge.  Period!

Executive education and training programs help in creating awareness for change – however, behavior change requires customized solutions and consistent follow-up and accountability, which executive coaching provides by its design.

Guaranteed and measurable leadership growth 

Would you like to develop leaders in your organization?  We use Marshall Goldsmith’s stakeholder centered coaching process to deliver measurable and guaranteed leadership growth.

NAL Triple Advantage Leadership Coaching

That delivers guaranteed and measurable leadership growth.  It is based on a stakeholder-centered coaching process with a 95% effectiveness rate (in a study or 11000 leaders on 4 continents).  It is used by companies ranging from startups to 150 of the Fortune 500 companies to develop their leaders.

Here are some of the salient benefits of NAL Triple Advantage Leadership Coaching

Time and resource-efficient: The leader does not have to leave work to attend training programs.  We go to the leader and her team.  And it only takes 1.5 hours per month. The rest of the time, the leader is working to implement with her team.

Separate and customized improvement areas for each leader: Every leader is different.  One size fits all approach doesn’t work.  Individual development areas for each leader aligned to the business strategy.

Involves entire team: Unlike most leadership programs, NAL Triple Advantage Leadership Coaching involves the leader’s entire team, and it has a cascading effect – increasing the team effectiveness and improving organizational culture.

The leader becomes the coach: for continuous improvement for leaders themselves and their teams. It is like kaizen for your leadership development.

Cost-Effective: Our entire one-year coaching engagement often costs less than sending the leader to a short duration leadership program at any reputed B school.

Guaranteed and measurable leadership growth: as assessed – not by us – but anonymously rated by the leader’s own team members.

Pay us only after we deliver results!: We work with many of our clients on a pay for results basis.  What does it mean?  If the leaders don’t improve, you simply don’t have to pay us.

Schedule an exploratory 15-minute conversation with our leadership adviser today

Click the button below.

SCHEDULE NOW!

 

Contact us anytime

Tushar Vakil

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get my tips directly into your inbox every Monday morning.

Visit us on social networks:

© Copyright 2024 newageleadership.com | All Rights Reserved.